What’s this here now?

Oh the receipts we have!

If y’all have been with your Lady Yokels for awhile, you know that this blog was birthed out of an LTE that a very sore loser by the name of Blaine Young wrote when he lost his bid for County Executive 12 long years ago. We feel the need to quote it in its entirety, though you can certainly check for yourself here, as it’s very pertinent to the tale we are about to tell:

Jan Gardner won and I lost, 54 percent to 46 percent, in the election. Everyone knows that we do not get along and never did. That does not mean everything she did was wrong and it does not mean everything I did was wrong.

The citizens want people who govern, not bicker and always blame the person before. I did it and it was wrong. She must move past always wanting to prove me wrong, undoing everything I put in place and firing or demoting those I hired or who were close to me; otherwise, it will be a very long four years. People see it as being very petty and very hurtful to those who do not deserve it.

Look at the election results and turnout: I lost the election; Gardner did not win it. The Republican Party won big! I promised to only serve one term, and the voters, even Republican voters, made sure I kept my promise. I have learned that if your heart is not really in it, don’t do it.

The pendulum has to stop swinging because of growth/development if we are ever going to move forward in Frederick County. The choice is Gardner’s. I only wish I received the same advice I am giving her.

I have moved on in my life. I wish her the best of luck, as it is very tough trying to keep everyone happy while trying to keep your campaign promises.

If you want to check in on how Blaine has moved on with his life (mug shots included), please go ahead and take a deep dive into our archives. This past week there are two Blaine Young articles in the paper, one an LTE and another a story in which he was quoted. It has been our experience that when he starts writing letters it means he’s thinking of running for office again.

Exhibit A:

Well, last week Blaine has some new reasons for why he lost the election and he very poorly tries to tie them into why the data centers are an issue this election cycle:

Behold:

Fear helps spur people to vote

​It is interesting every election cycle to see what the hot topics will be that drive voters to the ballot box. Anger and fear work best.

Out-of-control taxes, bloated spending and property rights put me in office in 2010.

In 2014, what drove me out of office was too many cuts to the government, development, turning the county-owned nursing home over to a private company and turning over Head Start to the YMCA.

Twelve years later, it’s about data centers and national Trump policies.

It’s interesting that we want no new houses, no new apartments, no new heavy industrial and now no data centers.

While at the same time, we want no real cuts to the government and the majority do not want to pay more in taxes.

That just doesn’t work or add up, especially with current government employees such as teachers, police officers, firefighters and general government personnel wanting raises and cost-of-living increases.

I’m not even talking about requested new positions and new infrastructure.

We need more taxpayers, not more taxes, to keep pace. That’s called having some type of development happening. Growth fuels the engine of the tax base. It will be an interesting next four years.

By the way, since I left office, we are still building plenty of houses and apartments and all of the government cuts have been restored, plus many new government positions added.

Oh, by the way a private company still runs the county-owned nursing homes and the YMCA still runs Head Start, so they only used those issues to stir up voters while never reversing them. Remember fear and anger works the best.

Be careful of what’s said and what’s actually done once in office.

Elections have consequences. It’s called your tax bill.

Look, we aren’t saying he’s wrong about needing more tax revenue, but he’s wrong about why he didn’t get re-elected and we are going to fact check his nursing home claims. If you were here back in 2011, you’ll remember that Blaine Young and his cronies attempted to sell the nursing home, thereby leaving our economically disadvantaged seniors with less resources:

https://www.fredericknewspost.com/places/local/frederick_county/frederick-county-decides-to-sell-citizens-and-montevue/article_081aa110-d528-581f-b283-e04d2c052897.html

When Jan won, that was reversed. A private company does manage the property, but they do not own it. That is the difference that he’s glossing over. Therefore, his claim that a “private company still runs the county-owned nursing homes” is disingenuous at best. When it comes to the Head Start claim, he’s forgetting to mention why everyone got so mad at him and his board over all of that. It was the sexist comments that Kirby Delauter and Paul Smith engaged in while defending their decision to pull the county funding. Both men wondered why women couldn’t just stay home like their wives did.

But you know what folks? The inaccuracies, condescension, and lying aren’t even main point we want to bring up here regarding his LTE.

In the August 2nd edition of the Frederick News Post, there appeared an article about the data center developers handing out money to a bunch of different organizations in some kind of image rehab tour. What caught our eye here at Yokel headquarters was this:

Blaine Young, a member of the local Elks Lodge, said the concession stand is part of a larger $1.5 million renovation of the historic lodge building on West All Saints Street that has been underway the past five years.

He said the Rowan donation will pay the entire cost for the new concession stand across the street from the lodge, and for its supporting utility and security infrastructure.

It will replace an older stand that stood on the site, which was used during that Elks Lodge’s annual parade event and by other organizations for fundraising.

“It serves the community in a mighty way,” Richard Hall, exalted leader of the local Elks Lodge, said of the stand. “The churches use it; the youth organizations use it; the schools use it; we use it — so it’s a tremendous fundraiser entity to the community.”

Don’t look away folks!

Rest assured, if he does try to run again we’ll be here to remind everyone why he is a very poor choice.

Speaking of poor choices, let’s talk about the effect this data center is inevitably going to have on this election cycle. First of all, if you didn’t see, CE Fitzwater has reversed course about allowing these data centers on rural land:

https://www.fredericknewspost.com/news/continuing_coverage/data_centers/fitzwater-reverses-course-on-freeing-rural-land-for-data-centers/article_61f4261d-1f0a-5369-a2a3-4ecebc1aa788.html

Along with the moratorium, we are pleased to see the public’s concerns about these data centers and their impact on people’s health and the environment being addressed. What we are not pleased about is how some people are throwing the baby out with the bathwater while jumping on the bandwagon of any politician who has seen which way the wind is blowing and is all of the sudden anti-data center in a very cheap attempt to win votes. In one of these data center forums, this post was shared:

Holy A.I. generation!

You mean this Dan Cox?:

If you think that Cox is going to go against his dear leader in the long run, we’ve got some very nice bridges to sell to you.

And, if you need more information as to why he will be horrible, read all about him here.

Then there’s Jeff Holtzinger, someone who we’ve also written about, but whose fate for us has also been sealed with this picture and post:

That’s a 100 percent no go for us. These folks are also looking to gain favor with their data center stance. While ignoring the fact that the Board of Education has no say in where these data centers are built. If you haven’t read our last post all about them, please look. Endangering our educational system and the children within are not worth the price of all of this.

We’ll keep pointing things out to you, but please drop us a message if you have anything we may be missing.

Can some of y’all give it a rest already? Jenkins/Holtzinger edition.

Hopefully this year!

First of all we are very sorry to inform you that Chuck Jenkins is attempting to seek a 6th term as our High Sheriff. In the linked article you will see, and excuse us if our extreme laughter causes our typing to look a little shaky, that he decided to land on running for Sheriff again after considering runs for both Congress and County Executive.

In what world does he think that a Federally indicted, Trumpian-ICE loving sheriff would win either one of those offices?

After filing for re-election on Wednesday, The Baltimore Banner reported that Jenkins had the following to say about his realtionship with ICE:

“They have a job to do,” Jenkins said during a news conference after filing for reelection Wednesday morning.

“They’re good men and women that, again, have a job to do to protect this country, and I, as a sheriff, I believe I have an obligation to support them to the extent I can.”

We know that at least two people have filed to run for High Sheriff, and we really need to make sure this is the end of the reign of Jenkins. If you want to read more about him over the years, click here to visit our archived stories all about him.

Before we move on to our next subject, we’ll leave ya’ll with this:

Partying at Mar-A-Lago

Today we were made aware that former Frederick Mayor, William “Jeff” Holtzinger, was throwing his hat in the ring to be our next County Executive. We are a little long in the tooth around here, so when we heard this news our collective Yokel memory was reactivated about his tenure in office. We jumped in the FNP archives to see if our memory was accurate and boy was it ever. First, let’s begin with his most recent LTE, written in 2024, in which he wrote in to defend his old buddy, Neil Parrott (and yes that guy is also running again!) You’ll see why we chose to emphasize this part of his letter in a moment:

His opponent, April McClain Delaney, may be a fine person, but her experience is as a federal bureaucrat.

She lives in Potomac, outside the 6th District, and claims she is a common sense candidate.

One question for her is: Wouldn’t common sense dictate that she run for Congress in District 8, where she resides?

What’s wrong with this line of questioning you may be asking? Well, here’s what we remembered about Mr. Holtzinger’s tenure as mayor. He was constantly avoiding the subject of where he lived. Because, even though he may have secured himself a residence in the City of Frederick, per the rules of the city charter, he probably was not residing in that residence with his family full time. We found a few archived articles that you can peruse to read all about that drama.

https://www.fredericknewspost.com/archive/where-does-jeff-live/article_d6278b7c-e59d-5e35-841f-7d54bc50c899.html

https://www.fredericknewspost.com/archives/house-not-a-home/article_26c6a23f-ab8c-5839-9e89-403044f83632.html

https://www.fredericknewspost.com/archives/wanted-mayors-missing-address/article_b81d8a81-2260-5375-a436-bbf7c9929436.html

But that wasn’t the only scandal that existed during his short tenure. He was also found in violation of the ethics law:

FREDERICK — Frederick Mayor Jeff Holtzinger’s hiring of his sister-in-law violated the ethics law prohibiting city officials from employing family members.

The city’s ethics commission met Monday to deliberate an advisory opinion on the employment of Donna Folden as City Hall’s project manager and released its statement Wednesday.

“The Ethics Commission recommends that the subject employment relationship between (Mr. Holtzinger) and (Ms. Folden) be severed and the resulting position be advertised and the hiring process be conducted by (Human Resources) in full compliance with all City of Frederick rules and regulations,” states the opinion, written by Ethics Chairman Richard Stup.

Mr. Holtzinger said the opinion does not cite himself or his sister-in-law of any wrongdoing but states the hiring process was not adequate.

“It’s a disappointment. I certainly didn’t go into this to cause any controversy,” he said. “The person has worked hard and done a good job.”

Ms. Folden, who did not wish to comment, was hired in February and will be forced to resign and leave her position by April 19, Mr. Holtzinger said.

However, this wasn’t the only questionable hire he had a hand in, according to another FNP article:

Starting with his defense a few weeks ago of hiring an unqualified relative of a city employee as a full-time horticulturist this summer (at $38,000 a year with benefits), who also happens to be a full-time college student, and ending with an offer of resignation from planning director Chuck Boyd who believes the administration is trying to drive him out.

The 19-year-old horticulturist’s hours have since been cut to accommodate her college schedule, including her participation on the FCC basketball team. The job requires an associate’s degree and three years experience, or six years experience. She has neither.

We should all believe a person the first time they show us how they handle themselves in political office. Too bad our fellow Americans couldn’t internalize that lesson with Trump.